Et lille beløb vil hjælpe mig enormt til at forsætte med mit oplysnings arbejde

11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case Against the FCC, Hearing Set for Jan. 25

After the FCC last month found no evidence of harm caused by wireless technology, CHD and other groups sued — and included 11,000 pages of evidence refuting the FCC’s conclusion.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

For decades, the public has been told there is no evidence that wireless technology is harmful. Claims of 5G harms have been dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”


landmark case against the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) contests these statements and asserts that the harms are proven and that an epidemic of sickness exists.


Recently, the leading environmental and health advocacy organizations that filed the case submitted 11,000 pages of evidence in support of their claims. (Links to the evidence are provided below).

The case is being heard by the U.S. Courts of Appeals of the DC Circuit. Oral arguments are scheduled for Jan. 25 at 9:30 a.m. EST. The public can listen to it on YouTube.


In December 2019, the FCC closed an inquiry it initiated in 2013 in which the commission asked the public to submit comments to the inquiry’s docket as to whether or not the FCC should review its 1996 health guidelines for Radio Frequency (RF) radiation emitted by wireless devices and infrastructure.


About 2,000 comments — an exceptionally large number — were filed with the FCC. These comments were filed by scientists and science organizations, such as the BioInitiative and EMF Scientist, by doctors and medical organizations, by cities, such as Boston and Philadelphia, and by hundreds of individuals including parents of children who were injured by this technology. The comments referenced thousands of studies showing clear and profound evidence of harm.


Nevertheless, the FCC order, published on Dec. 4, 2019, concluded there is no evidence that wireless technology causes harm, and no need to review the guidelines. The FCC decision didn’t provide an analysis of the science, disregarded the evidence of sickness and didn’t defend its decision with evidence.


Consequently, two lawsuits were filed against the…. read more here: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/landmark-5g-case-against-fcc-hearing-set-jan-25/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a84470c7-e480-4074-bb6a-1945be67a60d


By Children’s Health Defense Team

Danmark er officielt et medicinsk teknokratisk diktatur!

Danmark er officielt et medicinsk teknokratisk diktatur!

Med et flertal på 81 personer bliv den sindssyge epidemilov ført igennem den 23 februar 2021

ER DU MODIG ELLER FORTABT?

ER DU MODIG ELLER FORTABT?

På besøg hos virksomheden Cliunik i Roskilde, som kæmper en kamp for at overleve.   Støt dem med et lille

VACCINATION – EPIDEMILOV – TESTNING

VACCINATION – EPIDEMILOV – TESTNING

Jeg tog en god snak med erhvervsjurist Casper Knudsen omkring danskernes rettigheder når det kommer til vaccination, testning, love og